McFreedom

Politics, Guns, Law and Tech

Sunday, October 31, 2004

 

Whooping Cough

Reuters is reporting on the "comeback" of whooping cough - but completely misses the forest for the trees. Reading the article, we learn that "the culprit seems to be weakening effects of the shot." They quote Dr. David Hooper from Harvard Medical School: "We have a vaccine for it, but the problem with the vaccine is that immunity wanes after five years," and the solution apparently recommended is that teenagers need to get a booster shot.

Later in the article, they note that the Pertussis bacteria aren't changing their pathological characteristics under evolutionary pressure from the vaccine: ""It seems that 40 years of vaccination did not change the pathogenicity," they quote Nicole Guiso, the chief of the National Center for Infectious Disease at the Institut Pasteur in Paris as saying. However, "incidents [have been] steadily increasing since the 1980s."

Hmmm...the germ hasn't "evolved" in response to the vaccination. Yet, the incidents have been steadily increasing. Didn't the children getting vaccinated thirty years ago also have a weakening effect as they moved into their teenage years? Then why is this a growing problem now, if the vaccine is the same and the orgranism is the same? They do skim past the answer, quoted from the CDC, in the article, but miss its significance: "Most deaths occur among unvaccinated children or children too young to be vaccinated." And there are a lot more unvaccinated children, these days, now that not vaccinating your kids is trendy in some circles. So, it seems, the solution isn't to vaccinate the children at risk, but rather to get boosters for the teenage children of the parents who are civic-minded enough to vaccinate their children.

Now, of course, these articles are only as good as the experts they quote, and perhaps the experts at this conference didn't do a good job explaining the issue to the Reuters reporter. That said, it would be nice to have reporters that could use critical thinking to say, "These guys say nothing has changed in the past forty years, yet rates are on the rise - clearly there's some issue missing, here."


Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

Archives

April 2002   May 2002   June 2002   July 2002   August 2002   September 2002   October 2002   November 2002   December 2002   January 2003   February 2003   March 2003   April 2003   July 2003   September 2003   October 2003   November 2003   December 2003   January 2004   February 2004   March 2004   April 2004   May 2004   June 2004   July 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   July 2005   September 2005   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?