McFreedom

Politics, Guns, Law and Tech

Monday, August 28, 2006

 

Why Are We Playing By Their Rules?

New legislation to shine some sunshine into Washington has had a "secret hold" placed on it. People are now running around trying to expose the holder.

As best as I can tell, the way this works is, some Senator asks his party leader (either Mr. Frist for the Republicans or Mr. Reid for the Democrats) to hold the legislation. Many stories report that "Senate rules" "prohibit" these leaders from disclosing who the holder is. Many stories compare it to "classified" information.

WHICH rules? What are the sanctions? Senator Frist has said he "is a co-sponsor of the legislation, attempted to bring the legislation up for the vote it deserves before the August recess, and will continue to press for a vote as soon as the Senate reconvenes." He's also "vowed to get into the act, promising to try to pass the bill again when Congress returns from its break next month." So, Reid and Frist - both sponsors of the bill. One of them, by definition, has to know who the holder is (unless it was Jim Jeffords, I suppose). Can't we ask either of them, "Was it a member of your party?"

Beyond which, Frist has been most vocal on this issue. Why doesn't he tell us? I'm sure the official censure from the Senate has to be minor. He could probably even avoid that limited penalty by some vagueness. If it's truly a Democrat who's behind it, why not say something like "I'm sure no Republican would be stupid enough to block such an important bill." I can think of two reasons he won't deny it - either it's a Republican behind it, or he's engaging in quid pro quo with his colleagues across the ailse. Either way, we should in no way tolerate his suggestion that this is an important issue to him.

Pressure should be applied to Mr. Frist, if he wants so badly to "get into the act." Either he knows who it is, or he knows it's a Democrat. Either way, bloggers (and the press) should be putting a lot of pressure on him to either let us know who it is or eliminate 55% of the suspects. Allowing him to get away with being outraged but not actually helping us shows that either he's stupid, or we are.


Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

Archives

April 2002   May 2002   June 2002   July 2002   August 2002   September 2002   October 2002   November 2002   December 2002   January 2003   February 2003   March 2003   April 2003   July 2003   September 2003   October 2003   November 2003   December 2003   January 2004   February 2004   March 2004   April 2004   May 2004   June 2004   July 2004   September 2004   October 2004   November 2004   December 2004   February 2005   March 2005   April 2005   July 2005   September 2005   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?